Untold Stories
re: The Leak in Dept. 53
In May 2025 the Shasta County Superior Court family law department found themselves under pressure of an experienced adversary. Eight years previous in 2017, a local case disputant through a series of motions and precedents pressured the court presiding judicial officer into an 'in-house' resignation and 5-year self imposed exile to 'The Pedo Files Department'. Through that time period Republican Judge Molly Bigelow presided over standard area cases which she handled swiftly and efficiently for minimal disruptions to peoples lives.
​
Currently the liberal minded, liberal operating, and liberal Gary G. Gibson has been back operating in his preferred role; and since 2022 the court agenda set by this raging liberal presiding official is once again operating under the liberal position of a 'business model' court.
That May, Mr. Gibson was working his standard MO to extend a case indefinitely that he himself had scheduled for a May trial. Having previously illicitly cancelled the trial hearing the day of the trial as Mr. Gibson's standard case delay procedure, the old adversary case disputant had Mr. Gibson cornered on a Friday to set an immediate trial hearing date. Mr. Gibson offered to re-set the hearing for "Monday or Tuesday" of the very next week and business day. However, by his giddy Friday demeanor and the dozens of tells in his posture and mannerisms, it was crystal clear that Mr. Gibson had no intent whatsoever to proceed or hold the trial he scheduled for the upcoming Tuesday.
Having 8-years previously forced the 'departmental shuffle' the disputant turned long-time adversarial court activist was exceptionally prepared to counter the corrupt practices of Mr. Gibson's court. Formally trained in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a mediator, publicly exposing the corrupt practices and how to counter them was the approach the activist had been trained to apply for the scenario.
​
Legally combatting the corrupt official since February, the activist had begun using a simple 'edit hack' on Google reviews to both continually communicate with the court and to publicly expose the courts corrupt operating procedures, players; and the legal counters to their game. There was a big leak in Dept. 53 and it had been spouting openly on the internet for the last 3 months everything a business model court, attorneys, and the government works to keep citizens generally in the dark about.
​
And like clockwork. the scheduled trial hearing never happened. The court made a public announcement that there was a 'massive leak' on the '5th floor that started in Dept. 53' and the entire Shasta County Courthouse facility went into a government shutdown phase cancelling all court business for nearly two weeks. As the leak presumably couldn't be contained and just continued to grow and grow, and grow...
The activist had a plan and was anticipating another case cancellation. The activist countered the court shutdown by going on a digital rampage across the country and posting on more than 560 county courts 'most relevant content-Google reviews' covering at least 17 states and 1/3 of U.S. with what he called his 'Little pamphlet' in retaliation.
​
After 7-8 weeks of the digital Little pamphlet crop dusting campaign the simple but vital in the custody arena and heavily suppressed information had captured and held the west coast, and was scaling up and down the east coast set to encircle and pinch intended to digitally overthrow all of the United States Courts Google Reviews. The theory learned from an old conservative guru ADR professor was that providing key suppressed information to the general US public would allow the public to free themselves from corrupt practices in family courts and government oppression.
The activist Google Review press was shutdown in New York. The liberal area legal squad whispered in the right ear and the I.P. address of the activist was blocked and could no longer pass the coveted information on the public review sites. It was announced publicly by SCSC a week after that 'the leak from May' had been 'completely contained' and that 'business was back to usual' on the 5th floor.
​
The activist countered with a scale back- holding Rome.
ShastaCourtWatch.com
the 'Google review' info pamphlet
SCSC Specific
Re: CA standard custody; standardized corrupt practices EXPOSED in Shasta County
​
(1) **BEWARE** MARCI OLLER is the DARK BISHOP at this court. The 'Dark Bishop' role is assigned to write bias mediation reports that support COMMISSIONER ILLICIT ORDERS that intentionally unbalances cases and keeps them active. File and FL-300 motion to remove OLLER and assign a new mediator.
​
(2) As a TEMPORARY OFFICIAL, a commissioner (overseen and supervised by a judge) is the first official that hears standard custody cases. In corruptly administrated family courts like Shasta County Superior, the role of the commissioner is to posture as 'bad judge' unbalancing the case free of liabilities as a temporary official. The commissioner role is the state liability buffer and is the .gov 'Queen' in a theoretical game of chess litigants engage in with the state. Like in chess, the .gov opponent Queen is a free-ranging attack weapon and is the most important piece to sack and remove from the opponents position.
​
The Commissioner is LEGALLY REMOVED by either of the parties through a single written or verbal sentence called a NON-STIPULATION.
​
A state judge supervises all cases and plays the role of 'the King. In classical legal theory, the mediation department is the 'Cavern of the Dark Bishops' and the Commissioner/Queen is viewed as the 'leader of the state bishops' and not legally a 'judge'. Once litigants remove the Commish, the Judge/King plays 'g00d judge' and should fix what the commissioner unbalanced to keep the parties in the system. However, the corrupt business model court exploitation model continues when a judge/King admins their case from the position of 'the JESTER'. The court as standard targets the middle and upper class with both money to assign and spread around to associates of the court, and children brought in good faith to the court- the court with dark intent uses as pawns to keep the parties engaged to maintain a volume of cases for state funding.
​
COMMISSIONER STROMBERG Dept. 51 is CORRUPT & ILLICIT
To file the NON-STIPULATION (CA 170.1) a the start of a commissioner hearing state "I do not stipulate to a commissioner hearing" and walla!!!... you have pulled the right string on the set of the Cavern of the dark Bishops to reveal the King behind the curtain.
Once a commissioner hears a matter there needs to be a significant change in circumstances to re-file and non-stipulate. FILE ANY NEW MOTION with a non-stipulation to move that motion and generally the entire case from the commissioner to the judge. The self-attorney can FILE A MOTION for ANYTHING they legally need to happen.
General rules for the position of the self-attorney 'Golden Knight' position:
​
1) **ALWAYS** NON-STIPULATE to the Commissioner. Write and refile the single sentence on a declaration with each new motion
​
2) File an FL-300 motion form for ANY ISSUE that needs a resolution. If a motion has not been filed, the issue cannot generally be heard by the court. ANYTHING you want to discuss or resolve needs to have a motion on file. When filed the clerk sets a date for prelim hearing. If a court date is already scheduled, the matter just filed can then be discussed at the already scheduled date. -If the judge seems to 'squash the motion' without resolution and without swearing in witnesses on the motion; refile the motion at your discretion. - File an EMERGENCY MOTION for anything perceived as an emergency - ** Be Aware** the Jester judge will ALWAYS illicitly CANCEL TRIAL HEARINGS the day of the trial hearing. An attorney knows the 'cancel' is going to happen and will ALWAYS PRETEND to be caught off-guard. Its a standard act and a legal mistrial eg.case#207551
​
3.) Evidence & the M-030 dec form
Document EVERYTHING OUT OF ORDER IN THE CASE and submit as PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE by attaching all evidence to the declaration M-030 Your own M-030 forms serve as THE ONLY WRITTEN ANALOG OF THE CASE. **ALWAYS** quote the judge’s statements and positions and submit to the record via this declaration process.
**Officially, evidence must be TESTIFIED TO BY A SWORN WITNESS to be ‘official evidence’. Use any filed M-030 with attached case ev. and either read them and dictate them on the stand, or hand them to a sworn in witness while you ask them questions. Then verbally request the evidence be ‘OFFICIAL EVIDENCE’.. and walla.
4.) Witnesses the self-attorney lists on their witness list and submits to the record via declaration- are barred from sitting in the courtroom in hearings due to 'their status as a potential witness'. File and list on your witness list those pesky in-laws or a child annoying individual and request the judicial officer have the baliffs remove them to the hallway at your discretion.
5.) Treat ALL TEXT COMMUNICATIONS as a SCRIPT and file as evidence.
6.) File CONTEMPT when opponent is in contempt of any orders. This starts a criminal case against the opposition. Paperwork is generally required to be served by a law officer (local sheriff service) or process server.
7.) Never hire an attorney for custody. File your own motions and take the .gov Queen off the chessboard with commissioner non-stipulation. If seemingly trapped- flood a circus-court jester judge with motions, challenges, and evidence.
All citizens are EQUAL KINGS in the eyes of US laws